Argument and Counterarguement Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Argument and Counterarguement - Essay Example In addition, Anderson highlights the fact that the state recognizes the union of males and females but not same sex marriages. In his conclusion, he emphasizes that marriages as recognized by the state, should be that of a man and woman, a relationship â€Å"ideal for procreative love, childbearing and childrearing† (Anderson). Anderson deduced that a marriage should be between a male and female from the fact that only a sexual relationship between a man and woman can make reproduction possible. He claims that marriage is intentionally for the reproduction of the human species. Since same-sex-relationships by nature cannot make reproduction possible, heterosexual marriages are believed to be what satisfies this objective of marriage. As Anderson says, â€Å"Marriage is based on the biological fact that reproduction depends on a man and a woman† therefore, marriage should be between opposite sexes. This argument is valid because it is based from observable facts. Anderson considers the emotional aspect of relationships and he does not disregard its importance in the union of two people. The emotional aspect is a vital consideration in every relationship however it is only a heterosexual relationship that can satisfy the emotional needs of each partner as well as the objective of marriage which is hav ing children. Although Anderson has a good point, such argument may not seem sound to other readers because not all people getting in a relationship would really want to have children. Moreover, not all heterosexual relationships can really successfully produce children just like the case of infertile men or of barren women. Using inductive reasoning, Anderson comments that based from religions such as Christianity, Judaism and Islam, marriage has always been recognized to be the union of males and females. Trying not to limit his position on the issue in accordance to religious views, the author also presents the philosophies of the great ancient Greek and

Say-on-Pay Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Say-on-Pay - Essay Example And will it reduce the situations where pay for failure takes place?† Shareholders are the owners of any given firm or company and the interest of the operations of the firm is always at their heart. They would not wish to impact negatively on the firm’s performance at any time, as this is likely to translate into losses. Furthermore, this is not a good happening for shareholders as they are interested in the returns that their investments are likely to bring. A talk on the aspect of say-on-pay is much in place since it has become a daily activity among investors to lay check on their employees. Most companies are today acting to ensure that the performance of their employees is commensurate to the returns they expect. Moreover, excellent performance results from an employee; this depends on how they are handled in terms of their welfare, remuneration and work environment. This study in its efforts to respond to the statement laid down above has to undergo a series of testing procedures of the hypothesis. This will involve a study on the thesis; the study will take varied approaches and methods. Since the practice is still new, it means there are no adequate secondary data hence observations of the few companies, which have employed the practice, would aid us in making deductions about the raised questions. Strict rules have to be laid down against executive compensation; this is because without this the executive are capable of embezzling shareholders’ funds. The fact that executives normally take the advantage of the separation that exists between the ownership and the management makes this even worse. Therefore, such a study is important for the following reasons. One, the study will give us the clear relationship that exists between pay and performance. Moreover, strategies or required changes are recommended in the process. The study will also clear the air as to whether there is any significant change when shareholders conduct a voting system to